The Bombay High Court deferred a 2017 defamation case to 2046, calling it an “ego fight” between elderly litigants. The court said such disputes waste judicial time and delay more urgent cases. The Bombay High Court has strongly criticised a long-running defamation case,
The Bombay High Court deferred a 2017 defamation case to 2046, calling it an “ego fight” between elderly litigants. The court said such disputes waste judicial time and delay more urgent cases. The Bombay High Court has strongly criticised a long-running defamation case,
In a rare and potentially historic clash between two of India's highest constitutional offices, President Droupadi Murmu has openly questioned a recent Supreme Court ruling that mandates timelines for approving bills passed by legislatures. This bold move marks the first time in independent India’s history that a sitting President has directly contested a decision made by the apex court, highlighting a deepening constitutional debate over the separation of powers. The Supr
In a rare and potentially historic clash between two of India's highest constitutional offices, President Droupadi Murmu has openly questioned a recent Supreme Court ruling that mandates timelines for approving bills passed by legislatures. This bold move marks the first time in independent India’s history that a sitting President has directly contested a decision made by the apex court, highlighting a deepening constitutional debate over the separation of powers. The Supr