Nashik TCS case expands with new evidence and international links alleged as prosecutors told a court in Nashik that an ongoing investigation into allegations of hurting religious sentiments and attempted forced religious conversion has uncovered additional material against key accused Nida Khan, while also extending the scope of the probe beyond the city.
During a hearing on the anticipatory bail plea, Special Public Prosecutor Ajay Mishra said the Special Investigation Team (SIT) has collected evidence suggesting that Khan attempted to influence one of the complainants to adopt Islam by introducing religious practices. According to the prosecution, the complainant was allegedly given a burqa, taught prayer rituals, and provided with religious books and mobile applications intended for religious learning.
Investigators further alleged that Khan regularly took the complainant to her residence, where she was instructed on wearing a hijab and burqa, and was guided through prayer practices. The prosecution also claimed there were discussions about changing the complainant’s name to “Hania.” Authorities said digital evidence, including Islamic-themed social media content and online videos, was found on the complainant’s phone.
The SIT told the court that the case has expanded beyond Nashik, with emerging links to Malegaon and Malaysia. Prosecutors alleged that co-accused Danish Sheikh had taken possession of the complainant’s educational and personal documents, which were to be transferred to individuals in Malegaon as part of a broader plan.
Further allegations suggest that the accused were preparing to send the complainant to Malaysia for employment through a contact identified as Imran. Investigators are examining whether financial backing played a role in the alleged conspiracy.
Mishra informed the court that Khan is currently absconding and that authorities need to seize her mobile phone to determine whether additional individuals may have been targeted. He argued that granting bail could risk witness tampering. The court has not granted her protection, and law enforcement retains the authority to arrest her.
Defense attorney Rahul Kasliwal denied the allegations, stating that no law in Maharashtra prohibits religious conversion. He argued that the charges pertain only to hurting religious sentiments and emphasized that no conversion had actually occurred. Kasliwal also challenged the filing of multiple FIRs, asserting that the case should be consolidated into a single complaint.
The court is scheduled to hear the matter next on Friday, May 2, 2026.
