The Opposition INDIA bloc has chosen Justice B Sudershan Reddy (retd) as its candidate for the upcoming Vice Presidential election scheduled for September 9, 2025. The former Supreme Court judge will face off against CP Radhakrishnan, the NDA's candidate, who is the Governor of Maharashtra and a prominent BJP leader from Tamil Nadu. As the Vice Presidential election approaches, let’s take a closer look at J
The Opposition INDIA bloc has chosen Justice B Sudershan Reddy (retd) as its candidate for the upcoming Vice Presidential election scheduled for September 9, 2025. The former Supreme Court judge will face off against CP Radhakrishnan, the NDA's candidate, who is the Governor of Maharashtra and a prominent BJP leader from Tamil Nadu. As the Vice Presidential election approaches, let’s take a closer look at J
Justice Brett Kavanaugh on Thursday addressed criticism regarding the Supreme Court's handling of emergency cases, often referred to as the shadow docket, during a conference in Kansas City attended by judges and legal professionals. In recent years, the court has faced increasing scrutiny for issuing decisions on urgent matters, particularly those involving policies from the Trump administration, without providing extensive explanations or holding full hearings. Critics have argued that
Justice Brett Kavanaugh on Thursday addressed criticism regarding the Supreme Court's handling of emergency cases, often referred to as the shadow docket, during a conference in Kansas City attended by judges and legal professionals. In recent years, the court has faced increasing scrutiny for issuing decisions on urgent matters, particularly those involving policies from the Trump administration, without providing extensive explanations or holding full hearings. Critics have argued that
In a notable alimony case heard by the Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai expressed strong criticism of a woman’s demand for Rs 12 crore in alimony, along with a BMW car. The woman, who had been married for just 18 months, was seeking an extravagant sum for her maintenance, despite being well-educated with qualifications including an MBA and experience as an IT expert. During the hear
In a notable alimony case heard by the Supreme Court of India, Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai expressed strong criticism of a woman’s demand for Rs 12 crore in alimony, along with a BMW car. The woman, who had been married for just 18 months, was seeking an extravagant sum for her maintenance, despite being well-educated with qualifications including an MBA and experience as an IT expert. During the hear
The Supreme Court of India has upheld the constitutional mandate of the Election Commission (EC) to revise electoral rolls in Bihar but raised serious concerns over the timing of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise. With Assembly elections looming in the state, the top court emphasized that while cleaning up the voter list was necessary, executing the exercise just months before the elections raised valid questions.
The Supreme Court of India has upheld the constitutional mandate of the Election Commission (EC) to revise electoral rolls in Bihar but raised serious concerns over the timing of the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) exercise. With Assembly elections looming in the state, the top court emphasized that while cleaning up the voter list was necessary, executing the exercise just months before the elections raised valid questions.
Washington, June 27 – The United States Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a significant legal victory on Friday by narrowing the authority of federal judges to issue sweeping nationwide injunctions, a move that could allow his contested immigration policies—including the attempt to limit birthright citizenship—to advance in parts of the country. However, the court stopped short of ruling on the constitutionality of Trump’s order, leaving the future of the bir
Washington, June 27 – The United States Supreme Court handed President Donald Trump a significant legal victory on Friday by narrowing the authority of federal judges to issue sweeping nationwide injunctions, a move that could allow his contested immigration policies—including the attempt to limit birthright citizenship—to advance in parts of the country. However, the court stopped short of ruling on the constitutionality of Trump’s order, leaving the future of the bir
The United States Supreme Court has handed President Donald Trump a significant legal victory by refusing to expedite a case challenging his broad reciprocal tariffs on imports. The court’s decision, delivered Friday, rejected an urgent scheduling request made by two family-owned companies that aimed to invalidate several of Trump’s import duties. The companies, Learning Resources Inc. and Hand2Mind Inc., had asked the justices to bypass the usual judicial process and conside
The United States Supreme Court has handed President Donald Trump a significant legal victory by refusing to expedite a case challenging his broad reciprocal tariffs on imports. The court’s decision, delivered Friday, rejected an urgent scheduling request made by two family-owned companies that aimed to invalidate several of Trump’s import duties. The companies, Learning Resources Inc. and Hand2Mind Inc., had asked the justices to bypass the usual judicial process and conside
The Supreme Court of India has come down hard on the Enforcement Directorate (ED), accusing the central agency of “crossing all limits” during its recent raids on Tamil Nadu’s TASMAC – the state-run liquor distribution corporation. These raids, conducted in March and again in May, have drawn sharp criticism from the judiciary for targeting a government-owned monopoly and allegedly overstepping legal protocols. A Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice BR Gav
The Supreme Court of India has come down hard on the Enforcement Directorate (ED), accusing the central agency of “crossing all limits” during its recent raids on Tamil Nadu’s TASMAC – the state-run liquor distribution corporation. These raids, conducted in March and again in May, have drawn sharp criticism from the judiciary for targeting a government-owned monopoly and allegedly overstepping legal protocols. A Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice BR Gav
The Supreme Court of India is currently hearing a significant challenge to the Waqf Amendment Act, a controversial law passed earlier this year that alters the composition and functioning of Waqf bodies across the country. The hearing, led by a bench headed by Chief Justice BR Gavai, features strong opposition from prominent legal figures who argue that the amendments infringe on religious rights and question the very definition of secularism in India. Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal,
The Supreme Court of India is currently hearing a significant challenge to the Waqf Amendment Act, a controversial law passed earlier this year that alters the composition and functioning of Waqf bodies across the country. The hearing, led by a bench headed by Chief Justice BR Gavai, features strong opposition from prominent legal figures who argue that the amendments infringe on religious rights and question the very definition of secularism in India. Senior Advocates Kapil Sibal,
In a firm stance on refugee policies, the Supreme Court of India today denied a Sri Lankan national’s request to remain in the country, stating, "India is not a dharmashala (free shelter) that can entertain refugees from all over the world." The remark came from Justice Dipankar Datta, who was sitting on a bench alongside Justice K Vinod Chandran, while hearing the plea of a man convicted under anti-terror laws. The petitioner, a Sri Lankan Tamil, was arrest
In a firm stance on refugee policies, the Supreme Court of India today denied a Sri Lankan national’s request to remain in the country, stating, "India is not a dharmashala (free shelter) that can entertain refugees from all over the world." The remark came from Justice Dipankar Datta, who was sitting on a bench alongside Justice K Vinod Chandran, while hearing the plea of a man convicted under anti-terror laws. The petitioner, a Sri Lankan Tamil, was arrest
The United States Supreme Court on Thursday appeared divided as it considered two major legal questions: the fate of former President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship, and the broader judicial practice of nationwide injunctions that lower courts have used to block such policies. Although none of the justices openly supported the constitutionality of Trump’s controversial order—which attempts to deny citizenship to certain individuals born
The United States Supreme Court on Thursday appeared divided as it considered two major legal questions: the fate of former President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship, and the broader judicial practice of nationwide injunctions that lower courts have used to block such policies. Although none of the justices openly supported the constitutionality of Trump’s controversial order—which attempts to deny citizenship to certain individuals born
In a rare and potentially historic clash between two of India's highest constitutional offices, President Droupadi Murmu has openly questioned a recent Supreme Court ruling that mandates timelines for approving bills passed by legislatures. This bold move marks the first time in independent India’s history that a sitting President has directly contested a decision made by the apex court, highlighting a deepening constitutional debate over the separation of powers. The Supr
In a rare and potentially historic clash between two of India's highest constitutional offices, President Droupadi Murmu has openly questioned a recent Supreme Court ruling that mandates timelines for approving bills passed by legislatures. This bold move marks the first time in independent India’s history that a sitting President has directly contested a decision made by the apex court, highlighting a deepening constitutional debate over the separation of powers. The Supr
A political war of words broke out in Delhi on April 5, 2025, between the BJP and AAP following the petition filed by Okhla MLA Amanatullah Khan, who challenged the Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 in the Supreme Court. Khan, a prominent member of AAP and former Chairman of the Delhi Waqf Board, has raised concerns that the Bill limits religious and cultural autonomy of Muslims, introduces arbitrary executive interference, and threatens minority rights in managing religious and charitable institution
A political war of words broke out in Delhi on April 5, 2025, between the BJP and AAP following the petition filed by Okhla MLA Amanatullah Khan, who challenged the Waqf Amendment Bill 2025 in the Supreme Court. Khan, a prominent member of AAP and former Chairman of the Delhi Waqf Board, has raised concerns that the Bill limits religious and cultural autonomy of Muslims, introduces arbitrary executive interference, and threatens minority rights in managing religious and charitable institution
The Supreme Court of India recently denied a maintenance plea filed by a woman seeking financial support from her estranged husband. The court ruled that since both individuals were employed as Assistant Professors and earned comparable salaries, there was no valid ground for granting maintenance. The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, cited Article 136 of the Constitution of India, stating that no case for interference was warranted. The wife had approach
The Supreme Court of India recently denied a maintenance plea filed by a woman seeking financial support from her estranged husband. The court ruled that since both individuals were employed as Assistant Professors and earned comparable salaries, there was no valid ground for granting maintenance. The bench, comprising Justices Abhay S Oka and Ujjal Bhuyan, cited Article 136 of the Constitution of India, stating that no case for interference was warranted. The wife had approach
The ongoing dispute between the Telangana government and Group-1 aspirants has reached a critical point as the Supreme Court of India delivered a significant verdict. With exams scheduled to commence today, many candidates had petitioned the court to postpone the Group-1 Mains exams, citing concerns over G.O. 29, which they argued would disadvantage reserved candidates. However, a three-judge bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud ruled that it would not interfere with the examin
The ongoing dispute between the Telangana government and Group-1 aspirants has reached a critical point as the Supreme Court of India delivered a significant verdict. With exams scheduled to commence today, many candidates had petitioned the court to postpone the Group-1 Mains exams, citing concerns over G.O. 29, which they argued would disadvantage reserved candidates. However, a three-judge bench led by Chief Justice DY Chandrachud ruled that it would not interfere with the examin
The Supreme Court of India has recently unveiled a redesigned statue of 'Lady Justice,' marking a significant shift from colonial influences to a more modern and culturally relevant representation of justice. Under the guidance of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, the new statue aims to embody contemporary values and reflect the ethos of Indian society. One of the most notable changes is the removal of the blindfold, symbolizing transparency and unbia
The Supreme Court of India has recently unveiled a redesigned statue of 'Lady Justice,' marking a significant shift from colonial influences to a more modern and culturally relevant representation of justice. Under the guidance of Chief Justice DY Chandrachud, the new statue aims to embody contemporary values and reflect the ethos of Indian society. One of the most notable changes is the removal of the blindfold, symbolizing transparency and unbia