The letter reportedly stated that the French investigation raises concerns under U.S. constitutional protections, particularly those tied to free speech. It characterized the case as an attempt to regulate online discourse through criminal proceedings, which the DOJ indicated conflicts with First Amendment principles.
The development follows actions taken in February 2026, when Paris prosecutors conducted a raid on X’s offices in France as part of a year-long inquiry. Authorities are examining allegations that the company or its executives may have engaged in algorithmic manipulation and improper data extraction practices. The investigation stems from complaints filed by French lawmakers and advocacy organizations questioning how content is prioritized and how user data is handled on the platform.
In its communication, the DOJ also expressed concern that France’s request for assistance could draw the United States into what it described as a politically sensitive legal matter. The letter suggested that such cooperation could set a precedent for using criminal law to regulate digital platforms in ways that may conflict with U.S. legal standards.
X has faced increasing scrutiny globally since Musk’s acquisition of the company, with regulators in multiple countries reviewing its policies on content moderation, data privacy, and compliance with national regulations. In response to the reported DOJ decision, an official affiliated with Musk’s artificial intelligence venture expressed appreciation, stating that the investigation lacks merit and should be discontinued.
As of Saturday, April 18, 2026, neither U.S. nor French officials had issued formal public statements confirming the report, and independent verification remains pending.
