In HIT 3, you’re seen playing a 45-year-old character. How did you come to terms with taking up a role older than your actual age?

Nani: Honestly, I think it’s refreshing. Most actors, including myself, often end up playing characters in their late 20s or early 30s regardless of our real age. But when I read the HIT 3 script, the idea of playing a 45-year-old felt different. I liked the shift in perspective, and it made the character more grounded and real.

Age stereotypes are strong in the film industry. Was there any insecurity in breaking away from that template?

Nani: I actually feel the opposite. I’m excited to turn 60. I believe that the older I get, the more layered and substantial roles will come my way. There’s a certain freedom in shedding that age-related insecurity. When you stop trying to look younger on screen, you unlock new kinds of stories and characters.

So, are you saying you're looking forward to roles like Amitabh Bachchan's 'Sarkar' in the future?

Nani: Absolutely! I’d love to play something like Sarkar. Those are the roles that challenge you, and more importantly, satisfy the actor in you. When I turn 60, I want to be part of stories that reflect maturity, power, and emotional depth. That’s where I see myself heading.

What do you think about the industry's resistance to let senior heroes play their age?

Nani: I think it’s changing. Look at Mammootty or Mohanlal – they’ve redefined what aging in cinema looks like. They’re doing commercial films and age-appropriate roles with equal ease. If our Telugu industry allows stars like Chiranjeevi garu or Balakrishna garu to explore these kinds of roles, audiences will welcome them with open arms.

Do you believe audiences are ready for their favorite stars to age on screen?

Nani: Definitely. Audiences have matured. They want meaningful cinema. They’ll always love the mass moments, but they also appreciate depth, emotion, and realism. When actors embrace their age on screen, they become more relatable and open the door to richer storytelling.