The Elon Musk OpenAI lawsuit ruling delivered a major courtroom victory for OpenAI after a California jury rejected Musk’s claims in a closely watched artificial intelligence case. A U.S. jury in Oakland, California, ruled against Musk on Monday, May 18, 2026, in his lawsuit against OpenAI, according to Reuters. The case focused on Musk’s claim that OpenAI had moved away from its original mission of developing artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity.

The Trump IRS lawsuit settlement is drawing new scrutiny after the Justice Department announced a $1.776 billion DOJ Anti-Weaponization Fund on Monday, May 18, 2026, as part of an agreement resolving President Donald Trump’s lawsuit over leaked tax return information. The settlement ends Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service, which was filed after his confidential tax records were leaked. Under the agreement, Trump and other plaintiffs are expected to receive a formal apology but no monetary damages. What the DOJ Anti-Weaponization Fund Means The DOJ Anti-Weaponization Fund is designed to review claims from people who say they were unfairly targeted by politically motivated government investigations or prosecutions. The fund could provide compensation or formal apologies to approved claimants. The proposal has quickly become a major political and legal issue because the money would come through a federal judgment fund, raising questions over taxpayer money, congressional approval and Justice Department oversight. Why the Trump IRS Lawsuit Settlement Faces a Congress Challenge Democrats argue that the Trump IRS lawsuit settlement could allow taxpayer money to benefit political allies of the president. Representative Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, has criticized the plan and argued that Congress did not authorize the fund. The expected Congress challenge to the Trump settlement fund may focus on whether the executive branch can create such a large compensation program through a lawsuit settlement without direct approval from lawmakers. Trump Tax Return Leak Remains at the Center The original case came from the Trump tax return leak, after confidential IRS information was disclosed and later reported by media outlets. A former IRS contractor, Charles Littlejohn, was prosecuted and sentenced to five years in prison for leaking tax records. The legal fight is now moving beyond the tax leak itself. The larger dispute is over whether the Justice Department can use settlement power to create a politically sensitive compensation fund involving claims of government “weaponization.” For US readers, the case matters because it could shape future limits on executive authority, federal settlements and how taxpayer-funded legal claims are handled when a sitting president is personally connected to the dispute.

The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Saturday arrested Manisha Mandhare, a Botany professor and member of the National Testing Agency’s (NTA) paper-setting committee for the 2026 NEET-UG exam held on May 3. Mandhare was taken into custody in Delhi after interrogation at the CBI headquarters. According to the CBI, Mandhare was a key source behind the leak of the NEET-UG 2026 Biology questions, acting as a “mastermind” following information obtained from retired Chemistr

Federal Accusations Against Yale The United States Department of Justice on Thursday, May 14, 2026, accused Yale School of Medicine of discriminating against white and Asian applicants. The allegations follow a year-long federal investigation into the university’s diversity-focused admissions practices. According to the Justice Department, Yale leadership intentionally selected applicants based on race, resulting in Black

U.S. authorities may move to drop criminal fraud charges against Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, according to a Bloomberg report cited by Reuters on Thursday, May 14, 2026. Reuters reported that the U.S. Justice Department could announce a decision as early as this week, but said it could not independently verify the report. No formal court filing confirming dismissal was immediately available. What the Gautam Adani Case Is About The case trac

Mamata Banerjee appeared in the Calcutta High Court in a lawyer's gown to argue the post-poll violence case following TMC's defeat to BJP, as incidents of political violence continue in West Bengal. Mamata Banerjee, the former Chief Minister of West Bengal, appeared at the Calcutta High Court on Thursday dressed in a black lawyer’s gown, representing her commitment to addressing the ongoing case related to post-poll violence in the state. The violence came after the Trinamool Congress (TMC) suffered a historic defeat in the 2026 West Bengal Assembly elections, which saw the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) take control of the state. The case, filed by Shirshanya Bandopadhyay, son of senior TMC leader and advocate Kalyan Bandopadhyay, involves allegations of widespread attacks on political workers and damage to TMC party offices after the elections. Since the election results were declared on May 4, reports of violent incidents, including clashes, bomb attacks, and vandalism, have emerged across multiple districts in Bengal. Both the BJP and TMC have blamed each other for the unrest, which has escalated tensions in the state. Mamata Banerjee’s appearance in court was seen as a sign of her ongoing commitment to the people of Bengal, as the TMC’s official post stated. It emphasized her role in upholding justice, constitutional values, and standing firm against the political violence, regardless of her party’s loss. Her supporters argue that she continues to demonstrate resilience and compassion in confronting the challenges facing her state. The case remains under judicial review, as the political environment in West Bengal remains highly charged following the party's defeat. The tensions are further amplified by the high-profile killing of Chandranath Rath, a close aide to Chief Minister Suvendu Adhikari, which occurred on May 6, intensifying the public outcry over the violence and lawlessness in the state.

Tiger Woods’ DUI case moved into a new phase after a Florida judge approved prosecutors’ request to access the golf star’s prescription medication records linked to a March crash investigation. The ruling, issued in Martin County on Tuesday, May 12, 2026, allows investigators to obtain records from a Palm Beach pharmacy covering prescriptions filled between January and March 2026. Prosecutors said the records could help determine whether medication played a role in the crash i

JPMorgan Chase is facing renewed scrutiny after former banker Chirayu Rana rejected a reported $1 million settlement offer tied to allegations of sexual assault, racial harassment, and workplace misconduct in New York City. The refiled lawsuit, submitted this week, includes new witness statements

Apple $250M Settlement: Who Could Get Paid? Apple has agreed to a $250 million settlement over claims it misled buyers about Siri AI and Apple Intelligence features. Eligible U.S. iPhone users may receive $25 to $95 per device if the deal gets court approval. Why Apple Is Facing Payout Claims The class-action lawsuit accused Apple of promoting advanced Siri AI features during the iPhone 16 launch cycle before some tools were

DC Judge Questions Jail Treatment in Trump Assassination Case A federal magistrate judge in Washington apologized to Cole Allen, the man accused in an alleged Trump assassination plot, after raising concerns over his jail conditions. U.S. Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui said the court had “grave concerns” about Allen’s treatment after defense lawyers argued he was kept under suicide precautions despite mental health assessments indicating he was not suicidal

Supreme Court Restores Abortion Pill Access Nationwide The Supreme Court has temporarily restored nationwide access to the abortion pill mifepristone by mail, blocking new restrictions. Patients can continue receiving the medication via telehealth and pharmacies without in-person visits—for now. What the Ruling Means Right Now In an emergency order issued by Justic

Internal investigation challenges high-profile allegations A former employee of JPMorgan Chase has been accused by sources of filing fabricated sexual harassment allegations against a senior executive after an internal investigation reportedly found no evidence supporting the claims. The allegations were initially brought forward in a lawsuit filed earlier this week under

Supreme Court redefines limits on race in redistricting The Supreme Court of the United States issued a 6–3 ruling on Wednesday, April 29, 2026, striking down Louisiana’s congressional voting map and finding that lawmakers had improperly used race in drawing a second majority-Black district. In the majority opinion, Justice

The Bombay High Court deferred a 2017 defamation case to 2046, calling it an “ego fight” between elderly litigants. The court said such disputes waste judicial time and delay more urgent cases. The Bombay High Court has strongly criticised a long-running defamation case,

Melina Trump criticizes Jimmy Kimmel over a controversial joke, calling it harmful rhetoric and reigniting debate over satire, media responsibility, and free speech. The controversy surrounding remarks made by a late-night television host has intensified in the United States, drawing a sharp response from First Lady Melania Trump and

Ranveer Singh submitted a revised affidavit before the Karnataka High Court on Saturday (April 25) during a hearing, expressing his unconditional apology over his mimicry of a character from Kantara: Chapter 1 at a public event last year. The court, after taking note of the affidavit, indicated that it is likely to dispose of the matter by recording the actor’s undertaking and closing the proceedings. The hearing pertained to Singh’s plea seeking to quash an FIR registered against him following remarks made during the International Film Festival of India in Goa. At the event, the actor had mimicked a role portrayed by Rishab Shetty and allegedly made references that hurt religious sentiments associated with a temple deity. The FIR invoked provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to promoting enmity and outraging religious beliefs. During the proceedings, counsel representing Singh informed the court that the affidavit had been revised to include an unconditional apology and an acknowledgment of the sentiments involved. The bench noted that the actor had also undertaken to visit the concerned temple within a specified period, and this assurance would be recorded while disposing of the case. The complainant, however, argued before the court that the matter involved a larger issue of faith and should not be treated as a routine legal dispute. The court responded by stating that it would issue an admonition, emphasizing that public figures must remain mindful of their words and actions, especially in matters linked to religious sensitivities. Earlier, the court had declined to stay the FIR, observing that celebrity status does not grant immunity from accountability. With the submission of the revised affidavit during the hearing and the acknowledgment of concerns raised, the court signaled that it would formally conclude the matter without engaging in a detailed legal examination.

A 56-year-old woman from the United Kingdom has chosen to undergo assisted suicide in Switzerland, highlighting the ongoing debate over end-of-life rights and mental health support. Wendy Duffy, who lost her 23-year-old son Marcus in a tragic choking incident four years ago, has said she no longer wishes to continue living due to overwhelming grief that she believes cannot be alleviated through conventional treatment. Marcus died after choking on food while asleep, an incident that

Julia Varvaro, a senior official within the Department of Homeland Security, has been placed on administrative leave following an internal review into allegations related to her personal conduct. The inquiry was initiated after a complaint triggered scrutiny by the agency’s Office of Inspector General, though officials have not publicly detailed the scope of the investigation. Varvaro, who serves as a deputy assistant secretary for counterterrorism, joined the department in 2025 a

Kash Patel has filed a $250 million defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic and reporter Sarah Fitzpatrick, alleging that a recent article falsely portrayed him as an alcoholic unfit for public office. Th

The U.S. Department of Justice has informed French authorities that it will not support efforts to investigate Elon Musk’s social media platform, X, according to a report published Saturday, April 18, 2026, by