A federal judge in Boston blocked President Donald Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee on Monday, June 8, 2026, ruling that the charge was unlawful and must be vacated. The H-1B visa fee ruling gives immediate relief to U.S. employers that depend on skilled foreign workers in technology, engineering and other specialized fields. H-1B Visa Fee Ruling Deals Setback to Trump Administration U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin ruled in Massachusetts tha
A federal judge in Boston blocked President Donald Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee on Monday, June 8, 2026, ruling that the charge was unlawful and must be vacated. The H-1B visa fee ruling gives immediate relief to U.S. employers that depend on skilled foreign workers in technology, engineering and other specialized fields. H-1B Visa Fee Ruling Deals Setback to Trump Administration U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin ruled in Massachusetts tha
Chirayu Rana’s lawyer exit has added a new complication to the former JPMorgan banker’s high-profile legal battle involving executive Lorna Hajdini and JPMorgan Chase. Attorney Daniel Kaiser filed to be discharged as Rana’s counsel shortly before a scheduled court appearance on Tuesday, May 26, 2026, according to reports. The hearing was expected to address whether Rana could continue to be identified as “John Doe” in court records. Daniel Kaiser Exits B
Chirayu Rana’s lawyer exit has added a new complication to the former JPMorgan banker’s high-profile legal battle involving executive Lorna Hajdini and JPMorgan Chase. Attorney Daniel Kaiser filed to be discharged as Rana’s counsel shortly before a scheduled court appearance on Tuesday, May 26, 2026, according to reports. The hearing was expected to address whether Rana could continue to be identified as “John Doe” in court records. Daniel Kaiser Exits B
A foreign divorce is not automatically valid in India just because a court in another country grants it. The Supreme Court has made it clear that when a marriage is governed by Indian matrimonial law, especially the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, any foreign divorce decree must satisfy India law, Section 13 CPC, jurisdiction rules, natural justice, and the legal principles already settled by the court. This means a US divorce may be valid in the US, but it may still fail in India if it does not ma
A foreign divorce is not automatically valid in India just because a court in another country grants it. The Supreme Court has made it clear that when a marriage is governed by Indian matrimonial law, especially the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, any foreign divorce decree must satisfy India law, Section 13 CPC, jurisdiction rules, natural justice, and the legal principles already settled by the court. This means a US divorce may be valid in the US, but it may still fail in India if it does not ma
Supreme Court Reaffirms Equal Rights The Supreme Court has once again reaffirmed that daughters have equal right to inheritance under Hindu law. The ruling makes it clear that a daughter is a legal heir to her father’s share in property and cannot be denied her claim only because she is a woman. This decision strengthens the principle of equality in family property matters and reminds families that daught
Supreme Court Reaffirms Equal Rights The Supreme Court has once again reaffirmed that daughters have equal right to inheritance under Hindu law. The ruling makes it clear that a daughter is a legal heir to her father’s share in property and cannot be denied her claim only because she is a woman. This decision strengthens the principle of equality in family property matters and reminds families that daught
The Elon Musk OpenAI lawsuit ruling delivered a major courtroom victory for OpenAI after a California jury rejected Musk’s claims in a closely watched artificial intelligence case. A U.S. jury in Oakland, California, ruled against Musk on Monday, May 18, 2026, in his lawsuit against OpenAI, according to Reuters. The case focused on Musk’s claim that OpenAI had moved away from its original mission of developing artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity.
The Elon Musk OpenAI lawsuit ruling delivered a major courtroom victory for OpenAI after a California jury rejected Musk’s claims in a closely watched artificial intelligence case. A U.S. jury in Oakland, California, ruled against Musk on Monday, May 18, 2026, in his lawsuit against OpenAI, according to Reuters. The case focused on Musk’s claim that OpenAI had moved away from its original mission of developing artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity.
Union Minister Bandi Sanjay Kumar’s son Bandi Bhageerath Sai was arrested in Telangana after the High Court denied interim protection in a POCSO and sexual assault case involving a minor. Union Minister’s Son Arrested After Court Order Bandi Bhageerath Sai, son of Union Minister of State for Home Affairs and BJP MP Bandi Sanjay Kumar, was arrested on Saturday, May 16, 2026, in connection with a sexual
Union Minister Bandi Sanjay Kumar’s son Bandi Bhageerath Sai was arrested in Telangana after the High Court denied interim protection in a POCSO and sexual assault case involving a minor. Union Minister’s Son Arrested After Court Order Bandi Bhageerath Sai, son of Union Minister of State for Home Affairs and BJP MP Bandi Sanjay Kumar, was arrested on Saturday, May 16, 2026, in connection with a sexual
U.S. authorities may move to drop criminal fraud charges against Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, according to a Bloomberg report cited by Reuters on Thursday, May 14, 2026. Reuters reported that the U.S. Justice Department could announce a decision as early as this week, but said it could not independently verify the report. No formal court filing confirming dismissal was immediately available. What the Gautam Adani Case Is About The case trac
U.S. authorities may move to drop criminal fraud charges against Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, according to a Bloomberg report cited by Reuters on Thursday, May 14, 2026. Reuters reported that the U.S. Justice Department could announce a decision as early as this week, but said it could not independently verify the report. No formal court filing confirming dismissal was immediately available. What the Gautam Adani Case Is About The case trac
DC Judge Questions Jail Treatment in Trump Assassination Case A federal magistrate judge in Washington apologized to Cole Allen, the man accused in an alleged Trump assassination plot, after raising concerns over his jail conditions. U.S. Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui said the court had “grave concerns” about Allen’s treatment after defense lawyers argued he was kept under suicide precautions despite mental health assessments indicating he was not suicidal
DC Judge Questions Jail Treatment in Trump Assassination Case A federal magistrate judge in Washington apologized to Cole Allen, the man accused in an alleged Trump assassination plot, after raising concerns over his jail conditions. U.S. Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui said the court had “grave concerns” about Allen’s treatment after defense lawyers argued he was kept under suicide precautions despite mental health assessments indicating he was not suicidal
Supreme Court Restores Abortion Pill Access Nationwide The Supreme Court has temporarily restored nationwide access to the abortion pill mifepristone by mail, blocking new restrictions. Patients can continue receiving the medication via telehealth and pharmacies without in-person visits—for now. What the Ruling Means Right Now In an emergency order issued by Justic
Supreme Court Restores Abortion Pill Access Nationwide The Supreme Court has temporarily restored nationwide access to the abortion pill mifepristone by mail, blocking new restrictions. Patients can continue receiving the medication via telehealth and pharmacies without in-person visits—for now. What the Ruling Means Right Now In an emergency order issued by Justic
The Bombay High Court deferred a 2017 defamation case to 2046, calling it an “ego fight” between elderly litigants. The court said such disputes waste judicial time and delay more urgent cases. The Bombay High Court has strongly criticised a long-running defamation case,
The Bombay High Court deferred a 2017 defamation case to 2046, calling it an “ego fight” between elderly litigants. The court said such disputes waste judicial time and delay more urgent cases. The Bombay High Court has strongly criticised a long-running defamation case,
Did Indian nationals exploit H-1B visas? Guilty plea reveals visa fraud scheme. Two Indian nationals have admitted to orchestrating a fraudulent H-1B visa scheme, confirming that the program was deliberately misused through false job claims linked to the University of California system. Between June 2020 and January 2023, the accused used a firm associated with one of them to submit petitions containing fabricated employment details, influencing approvals under the US immigration process.
Did Indian nationals exploit H-1B visas? Guilty plea reveals visa fraud scheme. Two Indian nationals have admitted to orchestrating a fraudulent H-1B visa scheme, confirming that the program was deliberately misused through false job claims linked to the University of California system. Between June 2020 and January 2023, the accused used a firm associated with one of them to submit petitions containing fabricated employment details, influencing approvals under the US immigration process.
Ranveer Singh submitted a revised affidavit before the Karnataka High Court on Saturday (April 25) during a hearing, expressing his unconditional apology over his mimicry of a character from Kantara: Chapter 1 at a public event last year. The court, after taking note of the affidavit, indicated that it is likely to dispose of the matter by recording the actor’s undertaking and closing the proceedings. The hearing pertained to Singh’s plea seeking to quash an FIR registered against him following remarks made during the International Film Festival of India in Goa. At the event, the actor had mimicked a role portrayed by Rishab Shetty and allegedly made references that hurt religious sentiments associated with a temple deity. The FIR invoked provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to promoting enmity and outraging religious beliefs. During the proceedings, counsel representing Singh informed the court that the affidavit had been revised to include an unconditional apology and an acknowledgment of the sentiments involved. The bench noted that the actor had also undertaken to visit the concerned temple within a specified period, and this assurance would be recorded while disposing of the case. The complainant, however, argued before the court that the matter involved a larger issue of faith and should not be treated as a routine legal dispute. The court responded by stating that it would issue an admonition, emphasizing that public figures must remain mindful of their words and actions, especially in matters linked to religious sensitivities. Earlier, the court had declined to stay the FIR, observing that celebrity status does not grant immunity from accountability. With the submission of the revised affidavit during the hearing and the acknowledgment of concerns raised, the court signaled that it would formally conclude the matter without engaging in a detailed legal examination.
Ranveer Singh submitted a revised affidavit before the Karnataka High Court on Saturday (April 25) during a hearing, expressing his unconditional apology over his mimicry of a character from Kantara: Chapter 1 at a public event last year. The court, after taking note of the affidavit, indicated that it is likely to dispose of the matter by recording the actor’s undertaking and closing the proceedings. The hearing pertained to Singh’s plea seeking to quash an FIR registered against him following remarks made during the International Film Festival of India in Goa. At the event, the actor had mimicked a role portrayed by Rishab Shetty and allegedly made references that hurt religious sentiments associated with a temple deity. The FIR invoked provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to promoting enmity and outraging religious beliefs. During the proceedings, counsel representing Singh informed the court that the affidavit had been revised to include an unconditional apology and an acknowledgment of the sentiments involved. The bench noted that the actor had also undertaken to visit the concerned temple within a specified period, and this assurance would be recorded while disposing of the case. The complainant, however, argued before the court that the matter involved a larger issue of faith and should not be treated as a routine legal dispute. The court responded by stating that it would issue an admonition, emphasizing that public figures must remain mindful of their words and actions, especially in matters linked to religious sensitivities. Earlier, the court had declined to stay the FIR, observing that celebrity status does not grant immunity from accountability. With the submission of the revised affidavit during the hearing and the acknowledgment of concerns raised, the court signaled that it would formally conclude the matter without engaging in a detailed legal examination.
The Delhi High Court has asked AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and Sanjay Singh, along with Congress leader Digvijay Singh and others, to respond to a petition related to the circulation of court hearing videos.The plea seeks contempt action against them for allegedly recording and sharing video clips of a High Court hearing on social media. The case is being heard by a bench of Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Justice Manmeet P.S. Arora. During the hearing, the Court made i
The Delhi High Court has asked AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and Sanjay Singh, along with Congress leader Digvijay Singh and others, to respond to a petition related to the circulation of court hearing videos.The plea seeks contempt action against them for allegedly recording and sharing video clips of a High Court hearing on social media. The case is being heard by a bench of Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Justice Manmeet P.S. Arora. During the hearing, the Court made i
The Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra government to pay ₹50,000 each as compensation to advocate Yogeshwar Kawade and former serviceman Avinash Date for wrongful handcuffing by police in a 2010 case. A division bench comprising Justices Urmila Joshi-Phalke and Nivedita Mehta observed that the act amounted to “unwarranted humiliation and in
The Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra government to pay ₹50,000 each as compensation to advocate Yogeshwar Kawade and former serviceman Avinash Date for wrongful handcuffing by police in a 2010 case. A division bench comprising Justices Urmila Joshi-Phalke and Nivedita Mehta observed that the act amounted to “unwarranted humiliation and in
US Supreme Court to hear major case on Catholic preschools and LGBTQ rights The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a significant case involving Catholic preschools in Colorado that declined to admit children of same-sex or transgender parents. The case is expected to address the growing conflict between religious freedom and anti-discrimination laws in the United States. The decision could have far-reaching implications f
US Supreme Court to hear major case on Catholic preschools and LGBTQ rights The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a significant case involving Catholic preschools in Colorado that declined to admit children of same-sex or transgender parents. The case is expected to address the growing conflict between religious freedom and anti-discrimination laws in the United States. The decision could have far-reaching implications f
Kash Patel has filed a $250 million defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic and reporter Sarah Fitzpatrick, alleging that a recent article falsely portrayed him as an alcoholic unfit for public office. Th
Kash Patel has filed a $250 million defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic and reporter Sarah Fitzpatrick, alleging that a recent article falsely portrayed him as an alcoholic unfit for public office. Th
Court denies interim relief to Nida Khan in TCS Nashik case A Nashik court has refused to grant interim protection from arrest to Nida Khan, one of the accused in the TCS Nashik BPO case, intensifying the legal pressure against her. The decision comes as police continue their search for Khan, who remains the only accused yet to be taken into custody. Khan had approached the court seeking anticipatory bail, citing her pregn
Court denies interim relief to Nida Khan in TCS Nashik case A Nashik court has refused to grant interim protection from arrest to Nida Khan, one of the accused in the TCS Nashik BPO case, intensifying the legal pressure against her. The decision comes as police continue their search for Khan, who remains the only accused yet to be taken into custody. Khan had approached the court seeking anticipatory bail, citing her pregn
The divorce case involving Vijay and his wife Sangeetha has been postponed once again, with the Chengalpattu Family Welfare Court deferring the next hearing to June 15. The case came up for hearing on April 20 before Judge Sasikala, but after a brief session, the court decided to adjourn the matter. This m
The divorce case involving Vijay and his wife Sangeetha has been postponed once again, with the Chengalpattu Family Welfare Court deferring the next hearing to June 15. The case came up for hearing on April 20 before Judge Sasikala, but after a brief session, the court decided to adjourn the matter. This m
In a significant legal development, a United States appeals court has ruled that construction work on a proposed ballroom project linked to Donald Trump at the White House can continue for the time being. The decision comes amid an ongoing legal dispute over the expansion plans, which have sparked debate o
In a significant legal development, a United States appeals court has ruled that construction work on a proposed ballroom project linked to Donald Trump at the White House can continue for the time being. The decision comes amid an ongoing legal dispute over the expansion plans, which have sparked debate o
AUSTIN, Texas — U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is scheduled to deliver a public lecture at University of Texas at Austin on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, as part of a series of events marking the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. According to university
AUSTIN, Texas — U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is scheduled to deliver a public lecture at University of Texas at Austin on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, as part of a series of events marking the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. According to university