Former Chief Justice of India DY Chandrachud has been appointed by Russia to an international arbitral tribunal hearing Ukrainian state-owned Oschadbank’s claim over assets and operations lost during the war. The treaty case involves losses in four Ukrainian regions and marks a notable new international role for the former CJI. Oschadbank claim Oschadbank’s claim concerns assets and busines

The legal battle over President Donald Trump's proposed White House ballroom has intensified after a federal appeals court upheld an order blocking construction unless Congress authorizes the project. The ruling marks another significant constitutional dispute involving presidential powers and could soon be decided by the US Supreme Court. The case has drawn nationwide attention because it raises questions about executive authority, federal oversight, and the future of one of the administration's most ambitious construction projects. Congress Approval Required for Ballroom Appeal A divided panel of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit ruled 2-1 that the administration cannot continue building the ballroom without explicit approval from Congress. The majority agreed with an earlier district court decision, stating that the dispute is about legal authority rather than the merits of the project itself. According to the judges, the proposed ballroom represents a substantial modification to the White House complex, making congressional authorization necessary before construction can move forward while litigation continues. The court temporarily paused enforcement of its ruling for two weeks, allowing the administration time to seek emergency relief from the Supreme Court. Supreme Court Challenge Planned by Trump President Donald Trump sharply criticized the ruling, describing it as "horrendous, politically motivated, and unlawful." In statements posted on Truth Social, he argued that the decision threatens national security and announced that his administration will immediately appeal to the Supreme Court. Trump also criticized the judges who formed the majority, noting they were appointed by Democratic presidents, while the dissenting judge had been nominated during his administration. The White House maintains that the project falls within executive authority and says the ballroom is necessary to improve facilities for official ceremonies, diplomatic receptions, and state dinners. East Wing Demolition and Ballroom Cost Construction began after the historic East Wing was demolished to make room for the new ballroom and an underground complex. Recent images from the site show major structural work already underway, including concrete sections extending above ground level. The administration has also cited security improvements, including underground infrastructure, as an additional justification for the project. The project's financial estimates have increased considerably since it was first announced. Initial projections placed the cost near $200 million before later revisions increased the estimate to $400 million. More recent reports indicate the total expense could approach $600 million. Although President Trump has repeatedly stated that private funding would cover the ballroom, reports suggest public funds are also contributing to the development. Ballroom Cost Faces More Legal Challenges The ballroom project is one element of President Trump's broader plan to reshape several prominent landmarks in Washington before the end of his current term in 2029. Other proposals, including modifications near the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool and construction of a large ceremonial arch, have also attracted legal scrutiny. The White House ballroom dispute now appears likely to become the first of these cases to reach the Supreme Court. The justices could ultimately determine how much authority a president has to undertake major construction projects on federally protected government property without direct congressional approval. The decision may establish an important constitutional precedent affecting future administrations and executive construction projects. The information in this case is based on the federal appeals court ruling, public statements from President Donald Trump, and filings connected with the ongoing litigation. A Supreme Court decision, if accepted for review, is expected to clarify the balance between presidential authority and congressional oversight regarding significant changes to the White House complex.

Johnson & Johnson proposed a $5.5 billion settlement covering about 76,000 existing lawsuits alleging its talc products caused ovarian cancer. Johnson & Johnson Talc Settlement Covers About 76,000 Claims Johnson & Johnson has agreed to a proposed $5.5 billion settlement aimed at resolving nearly all remaining US lawsuits alleging that its talc-based baby powder and other cosmetic products caused ovarian cancer. The ag

The Trump v. Barbara ruling preserved automatic U.S. citizenship for nearly all children born on American soil. In a 6-3 decision issued Tuesday, June 30, 2026, the Supreme Court affirmed a lower-court judgment blocking President Donald Trump’s executive order. What the Trump v. Barbara ruling decided Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the court’s principal opinion, joined by Justices Sonia S

MIAMI — A federal judge is examining whether the resolution of President Donald Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service involved deception, collusion or possible fraud on the court. U.S. District Judge Kathleen M. Williams ordered further briefing on Friday, May 29, 2026, after 35 former federal judges asked her to reconsider the case’s closure. No finding of fraud has been made. Trump, his two elde

Supreme Court Says Right To Walk On Safe Footpaths Is A Fundamental Right The Supreme Court has declared that walking on safe and clearly marked footpaths is a fundamental right, strengthening the legal protection available to pedestrians across India. In a significant ruling, the court said public authorities have a duty to provide and maintain footpaths wherever roads exist. The judgment pl

A federal judge in Boston blocked President Donald Trump’s $100,000 H-1B visa fee on Monday, June 8, 2026, ruling that the charge was unlawful and must be vacated. The H-1B visa fee ruling gives immediate relief to U.S. employers that depend on skilled foreign workers in technology, engineering and other specialized fields. H-1B Visa Fee Ruling Deals Setback to Trump Administration U.S. District Judge Leo T. Sorokin ruled in Massachusetts tha

Chirayu Rana’s lawyer exit has added a new complication to the former JPMorgan banker’s high-profile legal battle involving executive Lorna Hajdini and JPMorgan Chase. Attorney Daniel Kaiser filed to be discharged as Rana’s counsel shortly before a scheduled court appearance on Tuesday, May 26, 2026, according to reports. The hearing was expected to address whether Rana could continue to be identified as “John Doe” in court records. Daniel Kaiser Exits B

A foreign divorce is not automatically valid in India just because a court in another country grants it. The Supreme Court has made it clear that when a marriage is governed by Indian matrimonial law, especially the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, any foreign divorce decree must satisfy India law, Section 13 CPC, jurisdiction rules, natural justice, and the legal principles already settled by the court. This means a US divorce may be valid in the US, but it may still fail in India if it does not ma

Supreme Court Reaffirms Equal Rights The Supreme Court has once again reaffirmed that daughters have equal right to inheritance under Hindu law. The ruling makes it clear that a daughter is a legal heir to her father’s share in property and cannot be denied her claim only because she is a woman. This decision strengthens the principle of equality in family property matters and reminds families that daught

The Elon Musk OpenAI lawsuit ruling delivered a major courtroom victory for OpenAI after a California jury rejected Musk’s claims in a closely watched artificial intelligence case. A U.S. jury in Oakland, California, ruled against Musk on Monday, May 18, 2026, in his lawsuit against OpenAI, according to Reuters. The case focused on Musk’s claim that OpenAI had moved away from its original mission of developing artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity.

Union Minister Bandi Sanjay Kumar’s son Bandi Bhageerath Sai was arrested in Telangana after the High Court denied interim protection in a POCSO and sexual assault case involving a minor. Union Minister’s Son Arrested After Court Order Bandi Bhageerath Sai, son of Union Minister of State for Home Affairs and BJP MP Bandi Sanjay Kumar, was arrested on Saturday, May 16, 2026, in connection with a sexual

U.S. authorities may move to drop criminal fraud charges against Indian billionaire Gautam Adani, according to a Bloomberg report cited by Reuters on Thursday, May 14, 2026. Reuters reported that the U.S. Justice Department could announce a decision as early as this week, but said it could not independently verify the report. No formal court filing confirming dismissal was immediately available. What the Gautam Adani Case Is About The case trac

DC Judge Questions Jail Treatment in Trump Assassination Case A federal magistrate judge in Washington apologized to Cole Allen, the man accused in an alleged Trump assassination plot, after raising concerns over his jail conditions. U.S. Magistrate Judge Zia M. Faruqui said the court had “grave concerns” about Allen’s treatment after defense lawyers argued he was kept under suicide precautions despite mental health assessments indicating he was not suicidal

Supreme Court Restores Abortion Pill Access Nationwide The Supreme Court has temporarily restored nationwide access to the abortion pill mifepristone by mail, blocking new restrictions. Patients can continue receiving the medication via telehealth and pharmacies without in-person visits—for now. What the Ruling Means Right Now In an emergency order issued by Justic

The Bombay High Court deferred a 2017 defamation case to 2046, calling it an “ego fight” between elderly litigants. The court said such disputes waste judicial time and delay more urgent cases. The Bombay High Court has strongly criticised a long-running defamation case,

Did Indian nationals exploit H-1B visas? Guilty plea reveals visa fraud scheme. Two Indian nationals have admitted to orchestrating a fraudulent H-1B visa scheme, confirming that the program was deliberately misused through false job claims linked to the University of California system. Between June 2020 and January 2023, the accused used a firm associated with one of them to submit petitions containing fabricated employment details, influencing approvals under the US immigration process.

Ranveer Singh submitted a revised affidavit before the Karnataka High Court on Saturday (April 25) during a hearing, expressing his unconditional apology over his mimicry of a character from Kantara: Chapter 1 at a public event last year. The court, after taking note of the affidavit, indicated that it is likely to dispose of the matter by recording the actor’s undertaking and closing the proceedings. The hearing pertained to Singh’s plea seeking to quash an FIR registered against him following remarks made during the International Film Festival of India in Goa. At the event, the actor had mimicked a role portrayed by Rishab Shetty and allegedly made references that hurt religious sentiments associated with a temple deity. The FIR invoked provisions under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to promoting enmity and outraging religious beliefs. During the proceedings, counsel representing Singh informed the court that the affidavit had been revised to include an unconditional apology and an acknowledgment of the sentiments involved. The bench noted that the actor had also undertaken to visit the concerned temple within a specified period, and this assurance would be recorded while disposing of the case. The complainant, however, argued before the court that the matter involved a larger issue of faith and should not be treated as a routine legal dispute. The court responded by stating that it would issue an admonition, emphasizing that public figures must remain mindful of their words and actions, especially in matters linked to religious sensitivities. Earlier, the court had declined to stay the FIR, observing that celebrity status does not grant immunity from accountability. With the submission of the revised affidavit during the hearing and the acknowledgment of concerns raised, the court signaled that it would formally conclude the matter without engaging in a detailed legal examination.

The Delhi High Court has asked AAP leaders Arvind Kejriwal, Manish Sisodia, and Sanjay Singh, along with Congress leader Digvijay Singh and others, to respond to a petition related to the circulation of court hearing videos.The plea seeks contempt action against them for allegedly recording and sharing video clips of a High Court hearing on social media. The case is being heard by a bench of Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Justice Manmeet P.S. Arora. During the hearing, the Court made i

The Bombay High Court has directed the Maharashtra government to pay ₹50,000 each as compensation to advocate Yogeshwar Kawade and former serviceman Avinash Date for wrongful handcuffing by police in a 2010 case. A division bench comprising Justices Urmila Joshi-Phalke and Nivedita Mehta observed that the act amounted to “unwarranted humiliation and in