Moscow, Russia: Russian President Vladimir Putin has cautioned that the economic consequences of the ongoing conflict involving Iran could mirror the widespread disruption seen during the COVID-19 pandemic, highlighting mounting pressure on global supply chains and key industries. Speaking at a major business forum in Moscow, Putin said the instability in the Middle East is already causing significant strain on international production systems and logistics networks. He noted that cri

Authorities in Rowlett, Texas, have seized more than 62,000 suspected counterfeit luxury items and arrested one individual following an investigation into the alleged sale of fake designer merchandise through Facebook Live broadcasts. The Rowlett Police Department confirmed that the operation uncovered a large-scale distribution of imitation luxury products representing several well-known international brands. The investigation began in February after police received a tip about an online se

India has approved changes to its foreign direct investment policy to allow Chinese companies to invest in selected sectors, marking a cautious step toward improving economic ties between the two countries after years of strained relations. The decision was cleared by the Union Cabinet led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi and is aimed at easing investment constraints faced by certain industries while strengthening domestic manufacturing capacity. Under the revised policy framework, C

Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez has strongly criticized the ongoing military strikes against Iran, describing the escalation in the Middle East as a “disaster” and warning that the world cannot risk repeating the mistakes of history. His remarks come shortly after a trade threat was issued to Spain in response to Madrid’s refusal to allow two jointly operated military bases on Spanish territory to be used in the strikes. In a televised address, Sánchez emphasized the dang

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney has announced a high-profile visit to India as part of a broader Indo-Pacific tour, in what officials describe as a significant step toward revitalizing bilateral relations that have faced strain in recent years. The visit, scheduled from February 26 to March 7, 2026, will also include stops in Australia and Japan, reflecting Ottawa’s strategic focus on strengthening partnerships across the Indo-Pacific region. Carney’s itinerary begins in Mum

United States President Donald Trump has issued a fresh warning to global trade partners, threatening significantly higher tariffs for countries he claims have taken advantage of the American economy for years. The remarks come amid heightened uncertainty following a recent Supreme Court ruling that has reshaped the administration’s tariff authority and complicated ongoing trade negotiations. In a post on Truth Social, Trump cautioned that any nation attempting to “play games” in the w

The Indian government has decided to reschedule a planned visit by its trade delegation to Washington, DC, following fresh uncertainty triggered by the US Supreme Court’s decision to strike down former president Donald Trump’s “Liberation Day” tariffs. Officials indicated that the move reflects a cautious approach as both sides assess the legal and strategic implications of the ruling on the ongoing India-US trade deal discussions. The Indian delegation, led by chief negotiator Darpa

The Government of India on Saturday said it is closely examining recent developments in the United States after the US Supreme Court struck down former President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs. The Commerce Ministry stated that officials are assessing the implications of both the court ruling and subsequent announcements made by the US administration. In its first formal reaction, the ministry confirmed it had taken note of the Supreme Court’s judgment delivered on Frida

The United States Supreme Court on Friday struck down a series of broad tariffs imposed by President Donald Trump, ruling that the administration had exceeded its authority under federal law. In a closely watched 6–3 decision, the court determined that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act does not authorize the president to unilaterally impose sweeping duties on foreign imports, a finding that could have significant implications for future trade policy and executive power. The ruling addressed the legal limits of presidential authority under the IEEPA, a statute historically used to regulate economic activity during national emergencies. Writing for the majority, the court concluded that the law does not grant the executive branch the expansive tariff powers claimed by the administration. The decision effectively invalidates the contested measures and reinforces congressional oversight over major trade actions. In his dissent, Justice Brett Kavanaugh pointed to the administration’s use of tariffs as a tool of foreign policy leverage, including duties imposed on India over its purchases of Russian oil. He argued that the tariffs were part of sensitive international negotiations and should be viewed within the broader context of the president’s conduct of foreign affairs. Kavanaugh noted that the government had maintained the tariffs helped secure trade concessions from major partners such as China, the United Kingdom and Japan. According to the administration’s position, the measures were intended to open foreign markets to American businesses and support trade agreements valued in the trillions of dollars. The dissent specifically referenced the August 2025 decision to impose a 25 percent tariff on India for what the administration described as direct or indirect imports of Russian Federation oil. At the time, the White House framed the move as part of broader efforts tied to geopolitical negotiations and energy security concerns. The tariffs included a reciprocal component initially set at 25 percent and later reduced to 18 percent. Kavanaugh further observed that the administration subsequently eased the India-specific penalties in February 2026 after the government reported that New Delhi had committed to halting purchases of Russian oil and to increasing imports of American energy products. He argued that such developments demonstrated the traditional diplomatic use of tariffs as leverage in complex international negotiations. Despite these arguments, the majority held that statutory limits must guide the exercise of executive power, even in matters touching on foreign affairs and national security. The court emphasized that significant economic measures with wide domestic consequences require clear authorization from Congress. The decision marks a notable judicial check on presidential trade authority and is likely to influence how future administrations deploy tariffs in pursuit of foreign policy objectives. Legal analysts say the ruling reinforces the principle that emergency economic powers cannot be broadly interpreted to reshape global trade relationships without explicit legislative backing. While the immediate policy effects remain to be fully assessed, the judgment underscores ongoing tensions between the executive branch’s flexibility in foreign affairs and the constitutional role of Congress in regulating commerce. The case is expected to shape debates over trade strategy, energy diplomacy and the scope of presidential economic powers in the years ahead.

World leaders and policymakers reacted quickly on Friday after the Supreme Court of the United States ruled that President Donald Trump exceeded his legal authority by imposing sweeping global tariffs, a decision that effectively blocks a key component of his trade policy agenda. The ruling has prompted governments and market observers worldwide to evaluate the potential consequences for international trade, economic stability, and future US trade relations. Speaking at a White House breakfa

​The Supreme Court on Friday invalidated a significant portion of President Donald Trump’s sweeping tariff program, ruling that the law used to justify many of the import duties does not grant the president authority to impose such measures unilaterally. The decision marks a major development in the ongoing debate over presidential powers and U.S. trade policy. In a 6–3 ruling, the court’s majority concluded that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the statu

US President Donald Trump on Tuesday said that tariff threats played a decisive role in resolving several international conflicts during his tenure, claiming that economic pressure through trade measures helped prevent violence and bring rival nations to the negotiating table. In an interview with Fox Business, Trump asserted that at least six of what he described as eight wars were settled after he warned countries that they would face higher tariffs if hostilities continued. Among

A broad range of American goods, including wines, spirits, dry fruits, technology products and select industrial items, are set to enter the Indian market at zero or reduced import duties under the first phase of a new trade pact between India and the United States. The move is expected to lower retail prices for consumers, expand market access for businesses and strengthen bilateral trade ties between the two economies. Officials from both countries confirmed that they have finalised the framework for the initial phase of a bilateral trade agreement aimed at cutting tariffs and easing barriers that have historically slowed cross-border commerce. The framework will now be converted into a legally binding agreement, with signing expected by mid-March. Duty concessions are likely to come into effect immediately upon implementation, while some reductions will be introduced in stages. Under the arrangement, India will eliminate or reduce tariffs on several categories of US industrial and agricultural goods. These include dried distillers’ grains, red sorghum used for animal feed, soybean oil, fresh and processed fruits, and a variety of tree nuts. Almonds, walnuts, pistachios and certain lentils are among the products that will benefit from lower import duties. Alcoholic beverages such as wine and spirits are also expected to become more competitively priced in the Indian market as tariffs decline. The concessions extend beyond food and farm products. High-end cars and motorcycles, along with aircraft, semiconductor components and specialised machinery, will receive duty benefits. Medical and healthcare products, including select medicines for neurological, cardiac and diabetes treatment, as well as medical devices, diagnostic reagents, pacemakers, imaging equipment, hearing aids and artificial joints, are also covered under the pact. Both sides have agreed to address non-tariff barriers that affect trade flows. India has committed to easing restrictions that have delayed market access for US medical devices and to simplifying import licensing procedures for information and communication technology goods. These products are considered essential for India’s expanding data centres and industrial infrastructure. At the same time, New Delhi said it will adopt a calibrated approach to protect domestic producers, including small and medium enterprises and farmers. Minimum import prices on certain products, such as apples, have been fixed to safeguard local interests. In return, a wide basket of Indian exports will gain duty-free or preferential access to the US market. Spices, tea, coffee, coconut-based products, cashews, fruits such as mangoes, bananas, guavas and pineapples, along with bakery goods, cocoa products, seeds, vegetable planting material and processed foods, are among the items set to attract zero reciprocal tariffs. Officials said the measures could provide a significant boost to India’s agriculture and food processing sectors. Trade experts view the agreement as a step toward deeper economic integration between the two countries, with the potential to diversify supply chains and stimulate two-way investment. By reducing tariff and non-tariff barriers, the pact is expected to increase trade volumes, enhance competitiveness and create new opportunities for exporters and consumers on both sides.

India's relationship with the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) nations is evolving into a major trade partnership. In 2024-25, the bilateral trade between India and the six-nation bloc reached a substantial $179 billion, driven by strong exports such as gems, metals, electronics, and chemicals. With an existing free trade pact with the UAE since 2022, and a recent agreement with Oman, India is now focused on formalizing a comprehensive free trade agreement (FTA) with the GCC. This new agreement

India and the United States are moving closer to concluding what officials describe as a landmark trade agreement, with External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar indicating that the final details are being worked out and an announcement could come soon. Speaking at the conclusion of his visit to Washington on February 5, Jaishankar said negotiations had reached an advanced stage and expressed confidence that the pact would usher in a new phase of cooperation between the two countries.

India’s national security advisor Ajit Doval conveyed a firm message to senior United States officials months before the announcement of a new trade agreement between New Delhi and Washington, underscoring that India would not yield to public pressure or coercive tactics during negotiations. According to officials familiar with the discussions, Doval made it clear during meetings in Washington that India was prepared to wait out the current US administration if necessary rather than accept terms it viewed as unfavorable. The visit took place in early September, shortly after Prime Minister Narendra Modi held talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, signaling an active diplomatic phase for New Delhi across major global powers. During his interaction with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Doval reportedly emphasized that while India remained committed to reviving trade talks, it expected a more measured tone from Washington and less public criticism that could complicate bilateral ties. Officials said Doval sought to put recent acrimony behind the two countries and expressed interest in restarting substantive discussions on a trade deal that has been under negotiation for several years. At the same time, he warned that India would not be “bullied” by President Donald Trump or senior members of his team, stressing that any agreement must respect India’s economic interests and strategic autonomy. The remarks came months before Trump publicly announced progress on a trade deal with India following a phone call with Modi on February 2. That announcement marked a fresh attempt by both sides to rebuild momentum in economic cooperation after a period marked by tariff disputes and disagreements over market access. Diplomatic observers note that India’s approach reflects a broader foreign policy strategy that balances engagement with firmness. By signaling willingness to continue talks while resisting overt pressure, New Delhi appears intent on safeguarding domestic priorities while preserving its long-term partnership with Washington. The United States remains one of India’s largest trading partners, and both governments view closer economic integration as central to strengthening strategic ties in the Indo-Pacific. The Washington meeting is seen as part of quiet backchannel diplomacy aimed at lowering tensions and creating space for practical negotiations. With both sides now indicating readiness to resume dialogue, officials say the focus will be on rebuilding trust and advancing a mutually beneficial trade framework that supports growth and stability in the relationship.

US President Donald Trump held an extended telephone conversation with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Wednesday, engaging in wide-ranging discussions that touched on trade ties, energy cooperation, agricultural purchases, and several pressing geopolitical concerns, according to remarks shared by the American leader. Posting about the exchange on his social media platform, Trump described the dialogue as “excellent,” emphasizing that the call was both lengthy and substantive. He

Legendary investor Ray Dalio has cautioned that the global economy is approaching a dangerous tipping point, warning that mounting geopolitical frictions and unstable financial markets could trigger what he describes as a “capital war,” in which nations weaponize money, trade, and investment flows to exert influence over one another. Speaking at the World Governments Summit in Dubai, Dalio said the international system is not yet in such a conflict but is “on the brink,” with conditions that could quickly escalate. He described capital war as a scenario where governments restrict access to markets, impose sanctions, enforce capital controls, or use debt holdings and trade leverage to pressure rivals. According to Dalio, rising mistrust among major economies is increasing the likelihood of these tools being deployed more aggressively. He pointed to growing tensions between the United States and its allies and competitors as a key source of concern. Discussions surrounding Washington’s interest in Greenland, a Danish territory, as well as broader disagreements over trade and security policy, have unsettled investors. Dalio said some European holders of U.S.-denominated assets fear potential sanctions or restrictions, while American policymakers may worry about losing reliable foreign buyers for government debt. European investors have played a significant role in financing U.S. borrowing needs, accounting for a large share of foreign purchases of Treasurys in recent months. Any disruption to those flows could amplify volatility in global markets and increase funding pressures. Dalio noted that “capital, money, matters,” emphasizing that financial interdependence has become both a strength and a vulnerability for the global system. Since returning to office, President Donald Trump has introduced and, at times, rolled back punitive tariffs targeting several trading partners. Those policy shifts have added to market swings and uncertainty. Dalio said similar patterns in the past have often preceded broader economic confrontations, with governments imposing foreign exchange restrictions and tightening controls to protect domestic interests. Drawing parallels with history, he referenced periods leading up to major conflicts, when sanctions and trade barriers intensified rivalries between nations. He suggested that today’s environment could produce comparable strains, particularly in relations between the United States and China, or between the United States and Europe, where trade deficits and capital imbalances remain sensitive issues. Against this backdrop, Dalio reiterated his long-standing view that gold remains an effective hedge during periods of stress. Although prices have fluctuated recently, he said the precious metal continues to serve as a reliable diversifier for portfolios. Rather than focusing on short-term movements, he advised investors, central banks, and sovereign wealth funds to maintain a steady allocation to gold as protection against systemic risk. Ultimately, Dalio urged a disciplined approach to investing, stressing that diversification across assets and regions is the best defense in an increasingly uncertain economic landscape.

The Lok Sabha session on Tuesday was thrown into chaos after Rahul Gandhi, Leader of the Opposition, attempted to refer to an article based on former Army chief M M Naravane’s unpublished memoir. The reference ignited a fierce confrontation between the opposition Congress and the ruling BJP, which ultimately led to the adjournment of the proceedings. The tension arose when Gandhi, speaking on the Motion of Thanks to the President’s address, insisted on citing an article he claimed was lin

Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Monday welcomed a significant reduction in tariffs on Indian exports to the United States following an announcement by US President Donald Trump that the two countries had reached a bilateral trade agreement aimed at lowering reciprocal duties. Under the new arrangement, tariffs on Made in India products entering the US market will be reduced to 18%, marking a notable shift in trade relations between the two major economies. The agreement also provide