Roundup Lawyers Challenge $7.25 Billion Settlement Lawyers representing plaintiffs in a Supreme Court case concerning Roundup are attempting to derail a pending $7.25 billion class-action settlement. The settlement, which would resolve thousands of lawsuits against Bayer, the company that acquired Monsanto in 2018, is being criticized by some attorneys as overly favorable to the company while inadequately compensating people

Trump Rally in Suffern, New York  President Donald Trump held a rally in Suffern, New York, on Friday,May 22,2026 aiming to energize Republican supporters ahead of the midterm elections. Speaking at Rockland Community College, Trump emphasized economic issues, recent Republican victories, and tax cuts while frequently targeting Democratic policies and leaders. At one point, he referred to the Democratic National Commit

JPMorgan executive Lorna Hajdini has filed a defamation countersuit against former banker Chirayu Rana in New York state court, denying his sexual misconduct allegations and accusing him of spreading false claims that harmed her reputation. The Lorna Hajdini countersuit follows Rana’s earlier lawsuit against Hajdini and JPMorgan Chase, in which he alleged sexual abuse, harassment and workplace coercion. Hajdini denies the allegations, and JPMorgan has said it does

Anthropic Azure Maia 200 deal talks could give Microsoft a major test case for its in-house AI chips as cloud companies compete for high-demand artificial intelligence workloads. Microsoft is in early discussions to supply Anthropic with servers powered by Maia AI chips, Reuters reported on Thursday, May 21, 2026, at 1:14 PM UTC, citing The Information. The talks remain preliminary and may not lead to a final agreement. Why the An

The Elon Musk OpenAI lawsuit ruling delivered a major courtroom victory for OpenAI after a California jury rejected Musk’s claims in a closely watched artificial intelligence case. A U.S. jury in Oakland, California, ruled against Musk on Monday, May 18, 2026, in his lawsuit against OpenAI, according to Reuters. The case focused on Musk’s claim that OpenAI had moved away from its original mission of developing artificial intelligence for the benefit of humanity.

The Trump IRS lawsuit settlement is drawing new scrutiny after the Justice Department announced a $1.776 billion DOJ Anti-Weaponization Fund on Monday, May 18, 2026, as part of an agreement resolving President Donald Trump’s lawsuit over leaked tax return information. The settlement ends Trump’s $10 billion lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service, which was filed after his confidential tax records were leaked. Under the agreement, Trump and other plaintiffs are expected to receive a formal apology but no monetary damages. What the DOJ Anti-Weaponization Fund Means The DOJ Anti-Weaponization Fund is designed to review claims from people who say they were unfairly targeted by politically motivated government investigations or prosecutions. The fund could provide compensation or formal apologies to approved claimants. The proposal has quickly become a major political and legal issue because the money would come through a federal judgment fund, raising questions over taxpayer money, congressional approval and Justice Department oversight. Why the Trump IRS Lawsuit Settlement Faces a Congress Challenge Democrats argue that the Trump IRS lawsuit settlement could allow taxpayer money to benefit political allies of the president. Representative Jamie Raskin, the top Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, has criticized the plan and argued that Congress did not authorize the fund. The expected Congress challenge to the Trump settlement fund may focus on whether the executive branch can create such a large compensation program through a lawsuit settlement without direct approval from lawmakers. Trump Tax Return Leak Remains at the Center The original case came from the Trump tax return leak, after confidential IRS information was disclosed and later reported by media outlets. A former IRS contractor, Charles Littlejohn, was prosecuted and sentenced to five years in prison for leaking tax records. The legal fight is now moving beyond the tax leak itself. The larger dispute is over whether the Justice Department can use settlement power to create a politically sensitive compensation fund involving claims of government “weaponization.” For US readers, the case matters because it could shape future limits on executive authority, federal settlements and how taxpayer-funded legal claims are handled when a sitting president is personally connected to the dispute.

A Converse Reservoir dam IED found underwater in Mobile, Alabama, has raised security concerns around a key drinking water site after officials said the device was safely removed and detonated. The Mobile Area Water and Sewer System said the grenade-type improvised explosive device was discovered by divers who were surveying the dam for routine repair and maintenance at Converse Reservoir, also known as Big Creek Lake. MAWSS said it alerted the Mobile County Sheriff

PHILADELPHIA — A CBP canine named Nitro helped officers seize more than $44,000 in hidden cash from a passenger preparing to board a flight to Cancun, Mexico, at Philadelphia International Airport on Wednesday, April 30. According to U.S. Customs and Border Protection officials, the 54-year-old traveler initially claimed he was carrying only $10,000. However, officers later discovered more than $44,000 concealed inside separate envelopes in the passenger’s carry-on bag after Nitro alerted authorities during an outbound enforcement inspection. Why Was the Cash Seized? Federal law does not limit how much cash travelers can carry into or out of the United States. However, travelers must report amounts exceeding $10,000 to the U.S. Treasury. CBP officials said the passenger failed to properly declare the money and attempted to conceal the currency to evade federal reporting laws. Authorities seized the cash and later returned $240 before releasing the traveler. “This traveler concealed currency in multiple locations for the purpose of evading federal currency reporting laws,” Acting Area Port Director Elliott Ortiz said in a statement. CBP Says Currency Seizures Remain a Major Focus Nitro, a three-year-old chocolate Labrador retriever trained to detect currency, firearms, and ammunition, played a key role in the airport cash seizure. CBP said officers and agents seized an average of nearly $180,000 in unreported or illicit currency every day across U.S. borders during 2025, highlighting growing enforcement efforts tied to international travel and bulk cash smuggling investigations.

JPMorgan Chase is facing renewed scrutiny after former banker Chirayu Rana rejected a reported $1 million settlement offer tied to allegations of sexual assault, racial harassment, and workplace misconduct in New York City. The refiled lawsuit, submitted this week, includes new witness statements

How Japan Keeps Election Campaigns Short and Quiet Japan’s election system is drawing global attention for its unusually strict campaign rules that limit election periods to just 12 days and ban door-to-door canvassing entirely. The model stands in sharp contrast to the high-decibel political culture seen in countries like India and the United States. Under Japan’s Public Offices Election Law, candidates are not allowed to personally visit homes aski

Spirit Airlines Lawsuit Filed After Dementia Passenger’s Death A Spirit Airlines lawsuit claims a 75-year-old passenger with dementia was left without required assistance at Houston’s George Bush Intercontinental Airport before he died near the Eastex Freeway. The family of Marcos Humberto Vindel Osorio alleges the airline failed to protect a vulnerable passenger who was traveling with a known cognitive condition. Family Says Airline Was Warned Before Flight According to the complaint, Osorio flew from Palmerola International Airport to Houston on June 8, 2024. His relatives say they told Spirit Airlines at check-in that he had dementia and needed help after landing. The lawsuit says the family was assured assistance would be provided. Instead, Osorio allegedly cleared Customs and Border Protection at 7:43 PM but never reached the arrivals area where relatives were waiting. Houston Airport Incident Led to Fatal Freeway Search After Osorio disappeared, family members contacted authorities. He was later found dead on the Eastex Freeway, where investigators said he had been struck by multiple vehicles. The complaint argues he was “unaccompanied and disoriented” and likely walked for hours from the airport before reaching the highway. Airline Negligence Case Raises Disability Concerns The lawsuit cites airline disability rules, including passenger assistance duties under the Air Carrier Access Act. Family attorney Russ Brudner called the incident “every family’s nightmare.” Spirit Airlines has not publicly responded to the allegations. The case now raises wider questions about elderly passenger assistance, dementia travel risks, and whether airlines are doing enough to protect vulnerable travelers.

Internal investigation challenges high-profile allegations A former employee of JPMorgan Chase has been accused by sources of filing fabricated sexual harassment allegations against a senior executive after an internal investigation reportedly found no evidence supporting the claims. The allegations were initially brought forward in a lawsuit filed earlier this week under

The escalating legal dispute between Elon Musk and Sam Altman has entered a critical discovery phase, intensifying scrutiny over the direction of OpenAI. Musk’s lawsuit, initially filed in early 2024 and recent

The United States Justice Department is currently pursuing at least 300 foreign-born American citizens as part of an intensified denaturalisation effort, marking what officials describe as the largest such initiative in the country’s history. The legal process, which allows authorities to revoke citizenship obtained through fraud or concealment, has traditionally been used sparingly but is now being applied on an unprecedented scale. A senior offi

Kash Patel has filed a $250 million defamation lawsuit against The Atlantic and reporter Sarah Fitzpatrick, alleging that a recent article falsely portrayed him as an alcoholic unfit for public office. Th

A large protest by factory workers in Noida turned violent, with protesters vandalizing vehicles and throwing stones while police tried to control the situation. The protest took place in Phase 2 of Noida, an area home to several factories. Workers are demanding a salary increase and better benefits. As the situation escalated, police reinforcements were called in to prevent further unrest, and the protests caused heavy traffic congestion on key roads in Noida on Monday morning. The

Consumers in the United States who purchased Tom’s toothpaste products within the past six years may be eligible for compensation under a $2.9 million class-action settlement involving Colgate-Palmolive Company. The lawsuit alleged deceptive and misleading business practices related to the manufacturing, marketing, and sale of certain Tom’s toothpaste products, following concerns raised during a U.S. Food and Drug Administration inspection of a production facility in Sanford, Maine in May 20

A once-thriving retail hub in Santa Clara, California, is rapidly emptying as redevelopment plans move forward, prompting legal action from displaced business owners who allege unfair treatment by the property’s former landlord. Two tenants from the Homestead Shopping Center — Tous les Jours bakery and Fuheng Herbs — have filed separate lawsuits against former property owner David Bider and Cypress Investments, claiming they were misled and pressured into leaving prior to the si

CRANFORD, N.J. — Drivers in Cranford are being warned to follow crosswalk laws after local authorities carried out a targeted pedestrian safety enforcement operation during the week of Monday, March 23, 2026. The initiative, led by the Cranford Police Department, focused on improving compliance at marked crosswalks and reducing the risk of accidents involving pedestrians. As part of the operation, officers conducted a “pedestrian decoy” detail at a crosswalk equipped with a Rect

A Los Angeles jury has found Alphabet’s Google and Meta Platforms liable for $3 million in damages in a social media addiction lawsuit, a ruling that could set a precedent for thousands of similar cases. The lawsuit focused on the platforms' addictive design, which the plaintiff argued contributed to her addiction to YouTube and Instagram from a young age. This case, which highlights the growing concerns over social media’s impact on mental health, could influence future legal actions brought by parents, school districts, and attorneys general against tech giants. The plaintiff, a 20-year-old woman, claimed that the attention-grabbing features of the apps led her to develop an addiction, marking a significant legal focus on the platforms' design rather than the content itself. The lawsuit was filed amid mounting criticism of social media companies for their role in the safety of children and teens. At least half of American teenagers use platforms like YouTube and Instagram daily, amplifying concerns over the prolonged exposure to these platforms. Snapchat and TikTok were also named in the case but settled with the plaintiff before the trial commenced. Despite the ruling, Meta and Google have expressed their disagreement with the verdict, with Meta already evaluating further legal options. The ruling has minimal impact on the companies’ stock prices, as shares of Meta rose slightly, while Alphabet’s stock remained largely unchanged. The case adds to the growing body of lawsuits focused on social media addiction, with other similar cases expected to go to trial in federal and state courts. Critics have long called for more stringent regulations on social media use, but Congress has yet to pass comprehensive legislation on the matter. Meanwhile, numerous states have enacted laws governing social media use among children, with some requiring age verification for account creation, a measure that tech trade associations are challenging in court. As the debate intensifies, the impact of this verdict on future legislation and lawsuits against tech companies remains to be seen. The ruling could be a crucial step in holding companies accountable for the design of platforms that contribute to addiction and harm, particularly among vulnerable youth populations.