Supreme Court Reaffirms Equal Rights The Supreme Court has once again reaffirmed that daughters have equal right to inheritance under Hindu law. The ruling makes it clear that a daughter is a legal heir to her father’s share in property and cannot be denied her claim only because she is a woman. This decision strengthens the principle of equality in family property matters and reminds families that daught

Roundup Lawyers Challenge $7.25 Billion Settlement Lawyers representing plaintiffs in a Supreme Court case concerning Roundup are attempting to derail a pending $7.25 billion class-action settlement. The settlement, which would resolve thousands of lawsuits against Bayer, the company that acquired Monsanto in 2018, is being criticized by some attorneys as overly favorable to the company while inadequately compensating people

Trump Presses Court On Citizenship Case US President Donald Trump intensified pressure on the Supreme Court on Thursday,May 21,2026 warning that it would be a “disgrace” if the justices rule against his effort to limit birthright citizenship. Speaking at a White House event, Trump urged the court to support his position on automatic citizenship for children born in the United States, a policy central to his broader immig

The Trump birthright citizenship case is heading toward a major Supreme Court decision after lower courts blocked the president’s effort to restrict automatic US citizenship for some children born in the United States. President Donald Trump criticized the possibility of losing the case during remarks at the White House on Thursday, May 21, 2026, warning it would be a “disgrace” if the Supreme Court ruled against his administration’s positio

Supreme Court Questions Umar Khalid Bail Order in Major UAPA Observation In a significant legal development with potential nationwide implications, the Supreme Court on Monday observed that the long-established legal principle of “bail is the rule and jail is the exception” remains applicable even in cases registered under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA). The court also raised serious concerns

The Supreme Court’s Voting Rights Act ruling in Louisiana v. Callais did not strike down Section 2, but it sharply narrowed how the law can be used in redistricting cases. In a decision issued on Wednesday, April 29, 2026, the Court ruled that Louisiana’s SB8 congressional map was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander because the Voting Rights Act did not require the state to create an additional majority-Black district. What

Kamala Harris urged Democrats to consider a broader political strategy before the 2026 midterm elections, including discussions on the Electoral College, Supreme Court reform, redistricting and statehood for Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico. The former vice president made the remarks during a livestream hosted by Win With Black Women on Wednesday night, May 13, 2026, as Democrats debate how to respond to Republican-led redistricting efforts and recent court rulings affecting voting

Supreme Court Restores Abortion Pill Access Nationwide The Supreme Court has temporarily restored nationwide access to the abortion pill mifepristone by mail, blocking new restrictions. Patients can continue receiving the medication via telehealth and pharmacies without in-person visits—for now. What the Ruling Means Right Now In an emergency order issued by Justic

Supreme Court redefines limits on race in redistricting The Supreme Court of the United States issued a 6–3 ruling on Wednesday, April 29, 2026, striking down Louisiana’s congressional voting map and finding that lawmakers had improperly used race in drawing a second majority-Black district. In the majority opinion, Justice

US Supreme Court to hear major case on Catholic preschools and LGBTQ rights The US Supreme Court has agreed to hear a significant case involving Catholic preschools in Colorado that declined to admit children of same-sex or transgender parents. The case is expected to address the growing conflict between religious freedom and anti-discrimination laws in the United States. The decision could have far-reaching implications f

AUSTIN, Texas — U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas is scheduled to deliver a public lecture at University of Texas at Austin on Wednesday, April 15, 2026, as part of a series of events marking the 250th anniversary of the signing of the Declaration of Independence. According to university

Former Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal has raised concerns about judicial impartiality, accusing Delhi High Court judge Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma of attending four events hosted by the Adhivakta Parishad, a lawyers' body linked to the RSS. Kejriwal, who has long opposed the BJP-RSS ideology, stated that the judge's participation in these events creates a reasonable apprehension that the case may not be handled impartially. The AAP chief called the Delhi liquor policy case political an

Three pending cases before the Supreme Court of the United States could significantly alter the framework of the 2026 midterm elections, with potential changes to redistricting, campaign finance, and mail-in ballot rules. Legal analysts warn that decisions issued close to the election season may create confusion for voters, strain election systems, and disrupt campaign strategies nationwide.

Supreme Court ruling allows Trump administration to move toward dismissing Steve Bannon’s conviction. The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday, April 6, cleared the way for the Trump administration’s Department of Justice to seek dismissal of Steve Bannon’s contempt of Congress conviction, marking a significant development in a case tied to the January 6, 2021, Capitol attack investigation. The court granted a request from the Justice Department to vacate prior lower court r

The U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing a contentious policy backed by President Donald Trump that seeks to limit birthright citizenship, prompting strong objections from South Asian advocacy organizations that warn of widespread legal and social consequences. In an amicus brief submitted to the court, a coalition led by the South Asian American Justice Collaborative argued that the proposed restrictions could leave thousands of children born in the United States effectively stateless, creating long

The US Supreme Court is reviewing a major legal challenge to President Donald Trump’s January 2025 executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship. During a hearing on Wednesday, April 1, 2026, justices examined whether the policy aligns with the US Constitution and federal law. Birthright citizenship is based on the 14th Amendment, which states that anyone born in the United States is automatically a citizen, regardless of their parents’ immigration status. This principle

The Supreme Court of India on March 24, 2026, asked the West Bengal government if the Enforcement Directorate (ED) could approach the state police for a remedy regarding the alleged interference by Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee during the ED’s raids on the political consultancy firm I-PAC. This comes amid growing controversy surrounding the ED's legal plea under Article 32 of the Constitution, which seeks a CBI investigation into the alleged obstruction of its raids by Mamata Banerjee and

The Supreme Court of India, in a significant judgment delivered on March 24, 2026, has reaffirmed that individuals who convert to religions other than Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism cannot retain or claim Scheduled Caste status under the law. The ruling reinforces the constitutional framework governing caste-based reservations and legal protections in India. The verdict came in an appeal challenging an earlier decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court, which had quashed criminal proceedings filed under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The complainant, who was born into a Scheduled Caste but had converted to Christianity and was functioning as a pastor, had alleged caste-based abuse and assault. However, the court held that his conversion disentitled him from invoking protections meant specifically for Scheduled Castes. A bench of the Supreme Court observed that the Constitution (Scheduled Castes) Order, 1950, clearly restricts Scheduled Caste recognition to persons professing Hinduism, Sikhism, or Buddhism. The court described this restriction as categorical, stating that conversion to any other religion results in the immediate and complete loss of Scheduled Caste status, regardless of birth. The court further clarified that a person cannot simultaneously profess a religion outside the specified categories and claim Scheduled Caste identity for statutory benefits. It emphasized that such positions are mutually exclusive within the constitutional scheme, and no statutory protection or reservation can be extended once a person ceases to fall within the legally defined category. In its interpretation, the court also highlighted that the term “profess” implies a public declaration and active practice of a religion. This interpretation played a key role in assessing the individual’s eligibility, particularly in cases where religious identity is visibly demonstrated through roles such as clergy or religious leadership. The judgment is expected to have wide-ranging implications for individuals who convert to religions outside the constitutionally recognised framework while seeking benefits or protections linked to Scheduled Caste status. While the ruling reinforces existing legal provisions, it also brings renewed attention to ongoing debates about caste discrimination and its persistence beyond religious boundaries.

The Supreme Court of India has granted permanent commission to women officers in the Army, Navy, and Air Force, following a long-standing battle for gender equality within the Indian Armed Forces. This ruling comes after nearly 15 years of legal struggles, where women officers, especially Short Service Commission Women Officers (SSCWOs), faced systemic discrimination in securing permanent commissions and promotions. The Court delivered three key rulings on March 24, 2026, recognizin

United States President Donald Trump has issued a fresh warning to global trade partners, threatening significantly higher tariffs for countries he claims have taken advantage of the American economy for years. The remarks come amid heightened uncertainty following a recent Supreme Court ruling that has reshaped the administration’s tariff authority and complicated ongoing trade negotiations. In a post on Truth Social, Trump cautioned that any nation attempting to “play games” in the w