White House trade adviser Peter Navarro has again put US-India trade tensions in the spotlight after saying he was “firebombed” online by Indians over his criticism of New Delhi's tariff policies and purchases of Russian oil. His latest comments revive a controversy that began last year but come as Washington and New Delhi continue trying to manage their broader strategic and economic relationship. India backlash follows Navarro's trade criticism

The Trump tariff lawsuit filed by 25 US states challenges new forced-labour duties on 60 trading partners. The case questions the administration’s use of Section 301 and could affect import costs, India-US trade talks and future sanctions tied to Russian energy.   25 States Sue Trump Over New Tariffs A coalition of 25 US states sued the Trump administration on Monday, August 3, seeking to block

India is closely monitoring a proposed US law that could impose tariffs of up to 100 per cent on countries purchasing significant quantities of Russian oil and gas. The legislation, which has cleared the US Senate, is part of Washington’s broader effort to increase economic pressure on Moscow while discouraging continued purchases of Russian energy. India Energy Security Remains the Government’s Priority Speaking during the

Trump's generic drug tariff plan introduces a phased import duty that could reach 200% within three years, encouraging pharmaceutical companies to manufacture in the United States. The proposal could significantly affect India's pharmaceutical industry, which supplies nearly 40% of generic medicines used in the US. Trump Generic Drug Tariffs Target India Pharma Export

Mark Carney responds to US 50% tariffs by reaffirming Canada's commitment to free and fair trade while expressing readiness for negotiations with Washington. The Canadian prime minister says Ottawa will continue supporting workers, businesses and families as trade tensions escalate over dairy, automobiles and alcoholic beverages. Mark Carney Responds to US 50% Tariff

US imposes 50% tariff on Canadian goods as the Trump administration escalates trade tensions with its northern neighbour. The new duties target products including hockey sticks, wine and cement, while Washington cites unfair trade practices and retaliatory Canadian policies as the reason for the move. US Imposes 50% Tariff on Canadian Goods Amid Trade Dispute &n

Trump blames Canada wildfire smoke for unhealthy air across the United States and says the economic cost could be added to existing tariffs on Canadian goods. His remarks come as hundreds of active wildfires continue to spread smoke across North America, triggering widespread air quality alerts. Trump Blames Canada Wildfire Smoke, Warns of New Tariffs

A bipartisan group of US senators has introduced a revised sanctions bill that could impose tariffs of up to 100% on goods from countries purchasing large amounts of Russian oil and gas. India and China are among the five countries specifically targeted, placing renewed pressure on their energy trade with Moscow while raising questions about the future of India-US commercial relations. India tariff threat under revised US bill

The proposed free trade agreement between the European Union and India has moved into its last procedural stage after years of negotiation. Both sides have already agreed on the core framework, and the current focus is on legal refinement and institutional clearance before formal approval. Officials describe this phase as technical but decisive, as even small wording changes can affect implementation across sectors. The agreement is being revi

US–Europe tensions escalate over digital taxation dispute US President Donald Trump has renewed tariff threats against European countries over proposed Digital Services Taxes targeting large technology companies. In a statement posted on his social media platform, he warned that nations introducing such taxes could face tariffs of up to 100 percent on goods exported

India and the United States are edging closer to a structured trade agreement after fresh negotiations indicated reduced gaps on several contentious issues. US officials described the discussions as the most constructive phase so far, suggesting that a framework deal is now within reach, even though final clearance is still pending. The talks are part of a broader effort to establish a long-term Bilateral Trade Agreement aimed at improving market access, easing tariff friction, and stabilizing supply chain cooperation between the two economies. Tariff reduction and market access remain central issues At the core of the negotiations are tariff structures and access to each other’s markets. The United States is pushing for wider entry for industrial and agricultural goods, while India is focused on protecting sensitive domestic sectors while expanding export opportunities in technology, textiles, and pharmaceuticals. Both sides are trying to balance domestic political pressures with the need to expand bilateral trade volumes, which currently remain below their long-term potential despite strong economic ties. Digital trade and pharmaceutical rules under review A significant portion of the discussion is now centered on digital trade regulations and pharmaceutical standards. The US is seeking clearer digital data flow rules and stronger intellectual property protections, while India is prioritizing flexibility for its growing digital economy and affordable healthcare exports. Pharmaceutical trade remains a key pillar, with India seeking smoother regulatory pathways for generic drug exports, while the US is focusing on compliance and quality standard alignment. Strategic economic alignment driving urgency The urgency behind the negotiations is being shaped by global supply chain realignment and geopolitical competition. Both countries are increasingly aligning their trade policies within the Indo-Pacific framework, with an emphasis on reducing dependency on concentrated manufacturing hubs. India is positioning itself as an alternative global manufacturing base, while the US is looking to diversify sourcing and strengthen resilient supply networks. Next phase depends on unresolved policy gaps Despite visible progress, the agreement is not finalized. Several policy differences still need resolution, particularly around tariff ceilings, digital governance, and sector-specific protections. Officials from both sides are expected to continue technical-level discussions before moving toward a formalized trade framework. A final agreement timeline has not been confirmed, but momentum suggests continued acceleration in the coming months.

US-India Trade Deal Nears Final Stage The United States and India are approaching the final phase of a long-anticipated trade agreement, with officials indicating that negotiations are now in their “last mile” and could conclude within weeks. The development comes just ahead of a high-profile bilateral meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of the G7 s

Treasury Refunds $22 Billion in Customs Duties The U.S. Treasury Department announced on Wednesday, June 10,2026 that it refunded $22 billion in customs duties during May, marking the first major round of repayments after the Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s global tariff programme. The amount refunded matched the customs duties collected over the same period, effectiv

India-US Trade Talks Progress Trade negotiations between India and the United States moved closer to a potential interim agreement after four days of discussions in New Delhi. Officials from both sides described the talks as constructive, reflecting a shared commitment to deepening trade ties. The Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) led the American delegation, advancing discussions on t

Carney Calls For New Partnership Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney called for a new partnership with the United States during a speech in New York on Thursday, saying closer cooperation could help strengthen both countries. Carney said the global economy is going through a major rupture as the United States changes its commercial relationships, but argued that Canada and the US could still work together in key sectors such as aluminum, automobiles and critical minerals. His remarks came as trade tensions between the two neighbors continue to shape diplomatic and economic discussions. Trade Tensions Shape Message Carney has pledged to double Canadian exports to markets outside the United States over the next decade, while also signing more than 20 economic and security agreements in the past year. At the same time, US trade officials were in Mexico City for discussions on overhauling the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, though Canada was not part of the current round of talks. The exclusion adds pressure to Ottawa as it tries to protect its position in North American trade while reducing dependence on the US market. Canada Looks To Diversify The prime minister has previously described Canada’s close ties with the United States as vulnerabilities that must be corrected, especially after President Donald Trump threatened to annex Canada as the 51st state. Carney also criticized what he called American hegemony earlier this year, warning that deeper integration with major powers can create weaknesses that may be exploited. His government has moved to diversify partnerships, including a recent decision to buy military planes from Sweden instead of relying only on American manufacturers. In New York, however, Carney adopted a more conciliatory tone. He described the United States as dynamic, resilient and inventive, and said its founding values of liberty, democracy, justice and openness should continue to guide its future and the world. The message reflected a careful balancing act: Canada wants to reduce economic risk and expand global exports, but it also recognizes that cooperation with Washington on trade, security, autos, aluminum and critical minerals remains central to its long-term strategy.

US Pushes Tariffs Into Mexico Trade Talks The United States expects tariffs to be part of trade negotiations with Mexico this week as Washington prepares for talks tied to the future of the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said President Donald Trump remains concerned about the trade deficit with Mexico and indicated that tariffs are likely to remain a tool in the administration’s broader trade strategy, even with close regional partners. Rules Of Origin Face Fresh Scrutiny Greer said officials are expected to discuss changes to USMCA rules of origin, including requirements that could increase the share of American-made content in goods produced across North America. The issue is especially important for manufacturing and supply chains, as the United States seeks to reduce dependence on Asia and bring more production closer to home. Greer said Mexico has benefited from American efforts to diversify away from China, but Washington wants a more balanced distribution of production. Mexico Talks Seen As Productive The United States views Mexico as a major part of its regional supply chain strategy because it competes with Asian economies for access to the US market. Greer said the administration wants supply chains sourced from the Western Hemisphere wherever possible, pointing to pandemic-era disruptions that limited access to goods from Asia. The goal, he said, is to strengthen North American manufacturing while reducing the deficit with Mexico. Canada Negotiations Look More Difficult Trade talks with Canada appear more complicated. Greer said the United States has significant trade challenges with Canada and noted that Ottawa’s response to tariffs has differed from that of many other partners. Canada has argued that USMCA remains a strong agreement and does not require major renegotiation. The disagreement sets up a difficult review process as Washington seeks tariff-related changes while Canada pushes to preserve the existing framework.

The UK GCC trade deal could add an estimated £3.7 billion a year to Britain’s economy in the long run, while cutting tariffs for exporters selling into Gulf markets. The U.K. Department for Business and Trade announced the agreement on Wednesday, May 20, 2026, calling it a major step in economic ties with the Gulf Cooperation Council, which includes Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. The gove

EU-India FTA May Begin Within A Year The EU-India FTA could come into force within a year, potentially by early 2027, after both sides concluded negotiations on January 27, 2026. European Union Ambassador to India Hervé Delphin said the landmark free trade agreement is now moving through legal and procedural steps before ratification. The process includes legal vetting of the final text, followed by approvals in India and the European Union.

Trump signals sharp increase in tariffs on EU vehicles WASHINGTON — On Friday, May 1, 2026, U.S. President Donald Trump announced plans to raise tariffs on cars and trucks imported from the European Union to 25%, signaling a significant shift in U.S.-EU trade policy. The move, shared publicly in a statement, comes at a time when global markets remain sensitive to policy changes and could trigger broader economic repercussions. Trump stated that the European Union was “not complying” with the previously agreed trade deal, though he did not provide specific details regarding the alleged violations. The announcement marks a departure from the earlier tariff framework negotiated between both sides. Background of the US-EU Turnberry trade framework The current dispute traces back to a bilateral agreement reached in July 2025 between Trump and Ursula von der Leyen, which set a 15% tariff ceiling on most traded goods. Known as the Turnberry Agreement, the arrangement aimed to stabilize trade relations and reduce uncertainty for industries on both sides of the Atlantic. Both the United States and the European Union had reaffirmed their commitment to maintaining this framework even after legal and policy challenges emerged earlier in 2026. Legal challenges reshape tariff authority The agreement’s stability was called into question after a ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court, which determined that the president lacked authority to impose tariffs under an economic emergency declaration. Following the ruling, tariff limits were effectively reduced, prompting the administration to explore alternative legal pathways to implement new import taxes. Ongoing investigations into trade imbalances and national security concerns have since been cited by the administration as justification for a revised tariff strategy, potentially putting the original agreement at risk. Economic stakes for EU and global markets The European Union has consistently emphasized the importance of maintaining agreed tariff limits, noting that the deal was expected to save its automotive sector between €500 million and €600 million monthly. Trade between the U.S. and EU reached approximately €1.7 trillion ($2 trillion) in 2024, highlighting the scale of economic interdependence. European officials have reiterated that commitments under the agreement should be upheld, stressing that EU exports must continue to benefit from competitive tariff treatment without unexpected increases. Rising tensions threaten trade stability The proposed tariff increase introduces fresh uncertainty into one of the world’s largest trading relationships. Analysts warn that such measures could disrupt supply chains, increase costs for manufacturers and consumers, and strain diplomatic ties. As the administration moves forward with its trade investigations, the future of the U.S.-EU trade framework remains uncertain, with potential implications extending beyond the automotive sector into the broader global economy.

Why did Donald Trump warn the U.K. about tariffs? He cites digital tax concerns — U.S. President Donald Trump issued a strong warning to the United Kingdom, signaling potential tariffs if Britain does not eliminate its digital services tax targeting major American technology firms. Speaking from the Oval Office on Thursday, Trump criticized the policy as an unfair attempt to profit from U.S. companies operating abroad. The digital services tax, introduced by the