The Trump administration has set a narrow window for Iran to respond to a proposed agreement aimed at sustaining a ceasefire and addressing Tehran’s nuclear program, signaling that the pause in hostilities may soon expire without progress. According to U.S. officials, President Donald Trump is willing to allow only a few additional days for Iranian leadership to present a unified position, underscoring growing impatience in Washington over stalled diplomacy.
Officials familiar with internal discussions said the administration still views a negotiated resolution as achievable but is increasingly concerned about what it sees as divisions within Iran’s leadership. Reports indicate tensions between military figures tied to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and civilian negotiators, complicating Tehran’s ability to respond decisively to U.S. proposals. Disagreements reportedly surfaced after initial talks in Islamabad, where military leaders rejected elements discussed by diplomatic representatives.
Iran has yet to formally commit to a second round of negotiations, and a planned U.S. delegation visit—expected to include Vice President JD Vance—was ultimately canceled. The delay has fueled frustration within the White House, where senior officials have debated whether to extend diplomatic efforts or consider renewed military action. Following consultations with top advisers, including Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth, Trump opted to allow more time for negotiations.
Despite U.S. claims of internal fractures in Tehran, some analysts dispute that assessment. Mehran Kamrava of Georgetown University Qatar has argued that Iran’s leadership remains broadly cohesive, even amid leadership transitions and limited public visibility from senior figures.
Trump has also emphasized economic pressure as a key lever, pointing to restrictions affecting Iran’s oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz. While he has signaled reluctance to escalate militarily, officials caution that force remains an option if diplomatic efforts fail within the current timeframe.
Officials familiar with internal discussions said the administration still views a negotiated resolution as achievable but is increasingly concerned about what it sees as divisions within Iran’s leadership. Reports indicate tensions between military figures tied to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and civilian negotiators, complicating Tehran’s ability to respond decisively to U.S. proposals. Disagreements reportedly surfaced after initial talks in Islamabad, where military leaders rejected elements discussed by diplomatic representatives.
Iran has yet to formally commit to a second round of negotiations, and a planned U.S. delegation visit—expected to include Vice President JD Vance—was ultimately canceled. The delay has fueled frustration within the White House, where senior officials have debated whether to extend diplomatic efforts or consider renewed military action. Following consultations with top advisers, including Marco Rubio and Pete Hegseth, Trump opted to allow more time for negotiations.
Despite U.S. claims of internal fractures in Tehran, some analysts dispute that assessment. Mehran Kamrava of Georgetown University Qatar has argued that Iran’s leadership remains broadly cohesive, even amid leadership transitions and limited public visibility from senior figures.
Trump has also emphasized economic pressure as a key lever, pointing to restrictions affecting Iran’s oil exports through the Strait of Hormuz. While he has signaled reluctance to escalate militarily, officials caution that force remains an option if diplomatic efforts fail within the current timeframe.
